reCaptcha VS noCaptcha

My web developer friends must be knowing what captcha is so they can carry on to the next paragraph however for the not so familiar audiences the captcha is  that extra field you encounter when filling a form on the web where some characters are embedded in the picture and you have to enter the characters in the textbox….It is basically used to identify humans… oh not that we have aliens living among us.. but we do have automated scripts and robots on the web specifically created to spread spam and create unwanted links or even sometimes trying to hack the websites or systems.

While using Cpatcha 1 question a developer always faces is whether to use it or not ? Mostly it is counted as an overhead….Coz on one hand we talk about user friendliness and on the other we are telling the user to prove that he is not a robot by filling a field that is not even remotely connected to the user or even the form itself.

From my own experience….before using Captcha I used to get 50 comments daily on Redvapours.com that were spam and had all the words ranging from what lingerie does Paris Hilton wears to really asking me If I wanted hot babes right next to my neighborhood….. apart from that also count in the comments that start as “Hey.. your blog is really Cool… Check out blahblahblah.com I hope you will gain more insight”

…. Seeing that my website has relatively less traffic these 50 comments daily were enough to make me crib and at the end of the week I would select all the comments and BAAMM!! them into the trash… so that’s where Captcha proves helpful and that is where reCaptcha actually comes in. I have used reCaptcha in many of client’s websites and I am a fan of their usefulness and accuracy.

Besides stopping scam, reCaptcha also helps in digitizing textual documents… so the words that you actually put in are at least used somewhere and are not just for checking your authenticity. And there is a lot of old documents yet to be digitized and this could be an easy way to have them converted into modern formats useful for preserving them. Have a look at this for example… you can see the end document produced by reCaptcha Transcription.

So help the world digitize the books… do leave your comments below so you can claim a partnership in helping this cause (:

PS : The term CAPTCHA (for Completely Automated Turing Test To Tell Computers and Humans Apart) was coined in 2000 by Luis von Ahn, Manuel Blum, Nicholas Hopper and John Langford of Carnegie Mellon University. At the time, they developed the first CAPTCHA to be used by Yahoo. — taken from reCaptcha.net

3 thoughts on “reCaptcha VS noCaptcha

  1. Well, for comments “Akismet” is probably the best. It stop spam 99.99 % of times ;)

    I like reCaptcha as the words used are atleast making some sense. otherwise it is difficult to read similar characters say, which is 0 and which one O ?

  2. yea Akismet is good for filtering spam… but my view is why not utilize the effort spent by users to fill the Captcha… and that is what exactly recaptcha does. it uses it to digitize the textbooks… I agree with you too that recaptcha does get confusing sometimes but I guess that’s why they need our help to digitize it

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>