<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: reCaptcha VS noCaptcha</title>
	<atom:link href="http://redvapours.com/recaptcha-vs-nocaptcha/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://redvapours.com/recaptcha-vs-nocaptcha/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:48:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ankit Aggarwal</title>
		<link>http://redvapours.com/recaptcha-vs-nocaptcha/comment-page-1/#comment-2765</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit Aggarwal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:48:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redvapours.com/?p=127#comment-2765</guid>
		<description>Awesome concept. I didn&#039;t payed attention to &quot;Digitising Book&quot; previously. After reading About of ReCaptcha it is bit clear how the do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome concept. I didn&#8217;t payed attention to &#8220;Digitising Book&#8221; previously. After reading About of ReCaptcha it is bit clear how the do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Prince</title>
		<link>http://redvapours.com/recaptcha-vs-nocaptcha/comment-page-1/#comment-2755</link>
		<dc:creator>Prince</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 17:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redvapours.com/?p=127#comment-2755</guid>
		<description>yea Akismet is good for filtering spam... but my view is why not utilize the effort spent by users to fill the Captcha... and that is what exactly recaptcha does. it uses it to digitize the textbooks... I agree with you too that recaptcha does get confusing sometimes but I guess that&#039;s why they need our help to digitize it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yea Akismet is good for filtering spam&#8230; but my view is why not utilize the effort spent by users to fill the Captcha&#8230; and that is what exactly recaptcha does. it uses it to digitize the textbooks&#8230; I agree with you too that recaptcha does get confusing sometimes but I guess that&#8217;s why they need our help to digitize it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ankit</title>
		<link>http://redvapours.com/recaptcha-vs-nocaptcha/comment-page-1/#comment-2754</link>
		<dc:creator>Ankit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 16:31:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://redvapours.com/?p=127#comment-2754</guid>
		<description>Well, for comments &quot;Akismet&quot; is probably the best. It stop spam 99.99 % of times ;)

I like reCaptcha as the words used are atleast making some sense. otherwise it is difficult to read similar characters say, which is 0 and which one O ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, for comments &#8220;Akismet&#8221; is probably the best. It stop spam 99.99 % of times <img src='http://redvapours.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I like reCaptcha as the words used are atleast making some sense. otherwise it is difficult to read similar characters say, which is 0 and which one O ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
